Бюджет NASA-2016

Автор Apollo13, 03.02.2015 13:15:58

« назад - далее »

0 Пользователи и 1 гость просматривают эту тему.

Apollo13

На сайте НАСА появился проект бюджета 2016 года.

http://www.nasa.gov/news/budget

http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/NASA_FY2016_Summary_Briefing.pdf

http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/NASA_FY_2016_Budget_Estimates.pdf

18,5 млрд. Начало работы над миссией к Европе. SLS-EM1 уже значится в 2019 году.

testest2

ЦитироватьApollo13 пишет:
SLS-EM1 уже значится в 2019 году.
2019 фискальный год начинается в октябре. EM-1 планируется на ноябрь 2018-го.
законспирированный рептилоид

Apollo13

#2
http://spacenews.com/white-house-proposes-18-5-billion-budget-for-nasa/


ЦитироватьThe White House is seeking $18.5 billion for NASA in its fiscal year 2016 budget proposal released Feb. 2, including "immediate initiation" of a new Landsat spacecraft and a formal start of a mission to Jupiter's moon Europa, but could result in the termination of two long-running planetary science missions.

The overall budget request of $18.529 billion represents a $519 million increase from 2015, when NASA received $18.01 billion. That increase is spread across most agency programs except for aeronautics and education, which would be decreased compared to the fiscal year 2015 funding approved by Congress.

The 2016 budget proposal also includes the formal beginning of a project to send a spacecraft to Jupiter's icy moon Europa. However, NASA's request of $30 million for the mission, while double the $15 million it asked for in 2015, is much less than the $100 million allocated to the mission in the final 2015 appropriations bill.

However, the budget would eliminate funding in 2016 for the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity missions. NASA Chief Financial Officer David Radzanowski told reporters late Feb. 2 that NASA plans to evaluate the operations of those missions this summer. "We will identify potential funds for the potential continuation of operations" if they remain in good condition, he said.

The budget proposal would provide a significant increase to NASA's commercial crew program. NASA is seeking $1.244 billion for the program, an increase of more than 50 percent from the $805 million it received in 2015. Next year would also be the peak year of projected spending on the program, with spending dropping to $1.18 billion in 2017 and below $1 billion in 2018 and beyond.

Radzanowski said the sharp increase in commercial crew funding was based on the contracts it awarded in September to Boeing and SpaceX to develop commercial crew vehicles. If Congress appropriates less money and the two companies remain on schedule, he said, NASA will have to renegotiate the contracts. "As a result, we can no longer commit to having certified services by the end of 2017," he said.

NASA's Orion and Space Launch System programs would, by contrast, lose money compared to 2015. NASA is seeking $1.096 billion for Orion, a decrease of nearly $100 million from the $1.194 billion appropriated in 2015. SLS would lose even more, from $1.7 billion in 2015 to $1.357 billion in the 2016 request. That funding level, Radzanowski said, would keep the programs on track for a first SLS launch by November 2018.

The budget proposal says little about the Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), NASA's proposal to shift the orbit of a small asteroid into one around the Moon to be visited by astronauts. Funding for the agency's overall asteroid initiative is spread among the science, human exploration and operations, and space technology mission directorates.

Radzanowski told reporters that the fiscal year 2016 budget request includes $220 million for the overall asteroid initiative at NASA, including $50 million for near Earth object observations and $69 million to develop solar electric propulsion, a key technology for ARM. The remainder of the funds go to work on developing ARM itself, technologies and techniques for the later human mission to the captured asteroid, and NASA's Asteroid Grand Challenge.

In a speech at the Kennedy Space Center, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden indicated that NASA officials gave yet to make a decision about which of two options to pursue for the robotic mission: moving an entire asteroid up to 10 meters across, or taking a smaller boulder off the surface of a larger asteroid. That decision was due in mid-December but has been delayed. "We will make a decision soon on a capture option," he said, without offering more specifics.

Radzanowski said the ARM mission concept review, which had previously been scheduled for late February, is now planned for no earlier than late March. There was no schedule for announcing the choice between the two robotic mission options, he said. "It could be happening soon, in the next few days, or it could be happening at the [mission concept review]," he said.


Apollo13

https://twitter.com/jeff_foust/status/677030545751195648

ЦитироватьStand by for some highlights of NASA funding in the FY16 omnibus bill released late tonight. NASA gets $19.285B, nearly $750M above request.
ЦитироватьScience gets $5.589B. That includes $1.921B for Earth science (close to the request) and $1.631B for planetary (well above request).
ЦитироватьThat planetary figure includes $175M for a Europa mission that "shall include an orbiter with a lander" with a 2022 target launch date.
ЦитироватьExploration gets $4.03B, including $1.27B for Orion and $2B for SLS, the latter far above the administration's request.
ЦитироватьThe SLS funding includes $85M for work on the Exploration Upper Stage, and states that NASA shall not fund human-rating of the ICPS.
ЦитироватьThe Exploration account also includes "no less than" $55M for a "habitation augmentation module", with a prototype developed by 2018.
ЦитироватьSpace Operations gets $5.092B. That includes $1.2438B for Commercial Crew (moved from Exploration), the exact amount requested.

napalm

Не совсем понял как можно получить больше, чем запросили?

Apollo13

Цитироватьnapalm пишет:
Не совсем понял как можно получить больше, чем запросили?
Было несколько вариантов бюджета, в которых деньги перераспределялись по разному. В итоге дали "всем сестрам по серьгам". Почти.

Apollo13

http://spacenews.com/nasa-receives-19-3-billion-in-final-2016-spending-bill/

ЦитироватьNASA Receives $19.3 Billion in Final 2016 Spending Billby Jeff Foust — December 16, 2015


The omnibus spending bill released by Congressional appropriators Dec. 16 will give NASA an increase of $750 million over its original request for fiscal year 2016.



WASHINGTON — The final version of a fiscal year 2016 spending bill will provide NASA with nearly $19.3 billion, funding most agency programs at or above the administration's original request.
The omnibus spending bill, released by House and Senate appropriators early Dec. 16 after extended negotiations, allocates $19.285 billion to NASA for fiscal year 2016. That total is $756 million above the administration's requested budget and the total provided the agency in a House spending bill passed in August. It is nearly $1 billion above a Senate bill that appropriators approved in June but was never passed by the full Senate.
That increased spending, enabled by a budget bill passed in October that raised overall spending caps for discretionary programs, allowed appropriators to avoid long-standing debates about agency spending priorities by funding most programs at, or in some cases well above, the administration's request.
One big winner in the bill is the Space Launch System. The heavy-lift launch vehicle receives $2 billion in the omnibus spending bill, nearly 50 percent more than administration's request of $1.36 billion and higher than levels in the House and Senate bills.
The report accompanying the spending bill requires that NASA spend not less than $85 million of the SLS funding on an "enhanced upper stage," a reference to the Exploration Upper Stage NASA has planned to use on the first crewed SLS mission and subsequent flights. Agency officials have previously raised questions about whether that new upper stage could be ready in time for that mission. However, the increased funding, and a prohibition on spending funding to human-rate the Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage that will be used on the first SLS mission, is intended to address that.
Another agency program winning a significant budget increase is NASA's planetary sciences program. The omnibus bill provides $1.631 billion for the program, $270 million above the administration's request and $74 million above the House bill.
That total includes $175 million for a mission to Jupiter's moon Europa, which the bill's report states will include both an orbiter and a lander. NASA, which requested just $30 million for a Europa mission, is working on a concept called Europa Clipper that would go into orbit around Jupiter and make repeated flybys of Europa, but does not currently include a lander.
One of NASA's most hotly debated efforts, the commercial crew program, receives $1.2438 billion in the omnibus bill, the exact amount requested by the administration and several hundred million dollars above levels in the House and Senate bills. The final bill, like the earlier Senate bill, moves the program from the Exploration Systems budget account to the Space Operations one, which primarily funds the International Space Station.
The bill's report emphasizes that the full funding is intended to ensure that commercial crew systems currently under development by Boeing and SpaceX are ready to enter service in 2017, ending NASA's reliance on Russian Soyuz spacecraft to transport astronauts to and from the station. In August, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden notified Congress that he was extending a contract with Russia to cover Soyuz transportation services into 2018.
The report suggests NASA take money from payments earmarked for those future Soyuz flights to augment the funding provided by commercial crew. "The funds provided in this Act enable NASA to follow the fastest path to independence from Russia by providing for continuing development of a domestic crew launching capability," it states. "If necessary, NASA may derive resources for milestone payments from funds set aside for Russia by NASA for ISS crew launches scheduled to occur after U.S. providers will be operational in 2017."
The bill's report also sets aside exploration funding for a key element of NASA's future deep space exploration plans, a habitat module. The report specifies NASA spend "not less than" $55 million on a "habitat augmentation module," with a goal of having the prototype of such a module completed by 2018. NASA is currently funding several small studies of such modules, and has discussed developing a habitat that could be flown in cislunar space in the 2020s for missions lasting up to a year.
Not every NASA program received an increase in the omnibus bill. The agency's construction and safety, security and mission services accounts each received about $75 million less than requested. The space technology program received $686.5 million, $38 million less than requested, but above levels in the earlier House and Senate bills.
The bill specifies that about 20 percent of the overall space technology budget, $133 million, be spent on a satellite servicing project called Restore-L. That program, based at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, has been strongly supported by Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), the ranking member of the Senate Appropriations Committee.
The House is expected to vote on the omnibus bill by Dec. 18, with the Senate to follow no earlier than Dec. 19. In the meantime, Congress is expected to pass another continuing resolution (CR) Dec. 16 to keep the government funded, likely until Dec. 22. The current CR, funding the federal government at 2015 levels, expires Dec. 16.
NASA Fiscal Year 2016 Budget Request and Appropriations Bills[TH]Account[/TH][TH]FY16 Request[/TH][TH]House Bill[/TH][TH]Senate Bill[/TH][TH]Omnibus[/TH]
SCIENCE$5,288.6$5,237.5$5,295.0$5,589.4
– Earth Science$1,947.3$1,682.9$1,931.6$1,921.0
– Planetary Science$1,361.2$1,557.0$1,321.0$1,631.0
– Astrophysics$709.1$735.6$730.6$730.6
– JWST$620.0$620.0$620.0$620.0
– Heliophysics$651.0$642.0$649.8$649.8
– Education$0.0$0.0$42.0$37.0
SPACE TECHNOLOGY$724.8$625.0$600.0$686.5
AERONAUTICS$571.4$600.0$524.7$640.0
EXPLORATION$4,505.9$4,759.3$3,831.2$4,030.0
– Exploration Systems$2,862.9$3,409.3$3,510.0$3,680.0
– Commercial Spaceflight *$1,243.8$1,000.0
– Exploration R&D$399.2$350.0$321.2$350.0
SPACE OPERATIONS$4,003.7$3,957.3$4,756.4$5,029.2
– ISS$3,105.6$3,075.6$3,051.6n/a
– Space and Flight Support$898.1$881.7$804.8n/a
– Commercial Crew *$900.0$1,243.8
EDUCATION$88.9$119.0$108.0$115.0
SAFETY, SECURITY, AND MISSION SERVICES$2,843.1$2,768.6$2,784.0$2,768.6
CONSTRUCTION$465.3$425.0$352.8$388.9
INSPECTOR GENERAL$37.4$37.4$37.4$37.4
TOTAL$18,529.1$18,529.1$18,289.5$19,285.0
Amounts in millions of dollars.
* Commercial Crew funding was moved from Exploration Systems to Space Operations in the Senate and Omnibus bills.



АниКей

МОСКВА, 17 дек — РИА Новости. Конгресс США одобрил выделение 19,3 миллиарда долларов на развитие космической отрасли США, говорится на официальном сайте конгресса США.
"В бюджете НАСА финансируется на 19,3 миллиарда долларов, это увеличение на 1.3 миллиарда по сравнению с 2015 фискальным годом и усиление уровня продвижения лидерства США в космосе и науке", — говорится в итоговом документе Комиссии конгресса по бюджетным ассигнованиям при Сенате США.
Самая крупная статья затрат – 5,5 миллиарда долларов приходится на различные научные программы, затраты на исследования предусмотрены в размере 4 миллиардов долларов, включая выделение средств на дальнейшую разработку космического корабля Orion и ракеты-носителя SLS. Порядка 175 миллионов долларов будут выделены на создание аппарата "Европа-Клипер", который будет искать следы жизни на Европе, спутнике Юпитера, в конце 2020 или в начале 2030 годов. Около 2,8 миллиарда предусмотрено на меры и средства безопасности.

 

 
Отмечается, что финансирование НАСА в 2015 году было на 1,3 миллиарда меньше на фоне неуклонного сокращения бюджета после прихода к власти администрации Барака Обамы. Самые масштабные сокращения прошли в 2011 и 2012 годах, когда проект Constellation по возвращению на Луну и полет к Марсу были отменены, а ассигнования на исследование планет были урезаны на более чем 20%.
Как передает Планетологическое общество, на этот год было запланировано небольшое увеличение бюджета, большая часть чего должна была пойти на проекты по изучению Земли и разработку нового тяжелого ракетоносителя SLS, за счет небольших сокращений в финансировании проектов в области исследования планет и коммерческого освоения космоса.
Как отметил Кэйси Дрейер (Casey Dreier), эксперт Планетологического общества в комментарии РИА "Новости", теперь "есть большие шансы на то, что зонд LRO (Лунный орбитальный зонд) и марсоход Opportunity не будут отключены". По его словам, окончательно это станет понятно в четверг и пятницу, когда будут опубликованы полные детали по бюджету на следующий год.
А кто не чтит цитат — тот ренегат и гад!

testest2

ЦитироватьАниКей пишет:
Отмечается, что финансирование НАСА в 2015 году было на 1,3 миллиарда меньше на фоне неуклонного сокращения бюджета после прихода к власти администрации Барака Обамы.
2013 - 16,9 млрд
2014 - 17,7 млрд
2015 - 18,0 млрд
2016 - 19,3 млрд
Даааа, неуклонное сокращение при Обаме.
законспирированный рептилоид

triage

может СМИ оперирует инфляционным коэффициентом больше чем (19,3-18,0)/18.0*100%=7,2%

testest2

Цитироватьpnetmon пишет:
может СМИ оперирует инфляционным коэффициентом больше чем (19,3-18,0)/18.0*100%=7,2%
С учетом инфляции (у них 2-3%) бюджет все равно растет. Он действительно обвалился с 2011 по 2013 год, после отмены Constellation. Но потом перешел в рост, поэтому говорить о неуклонном сокращении бюджета при Обаме просто нельзя. В 2016 году бюджет фактически достигнет уровня 2008-2009 годов, когда был пик расходов на лунную программу Буша. Оно и не удивительно: "Орион" остался, SLS заменила "Арес". Лунная инфраструктура не разрабатывается, но деньги съедает программа коммерческих пилотируемых кораблей.
законспирированный рептилоид